|
The regulations governing a California background check apply more
restrictions to investigating agencies that general federal law. All companies
and investigators carrying out employee screening in California must understand
what records they can and cannot have access to, and what employee, or job
applicants' rights are regarding access to these records.
There are many reasons for employee background checks to be carried out, and
probably the most obvious is in order that the employers protect themselves
against negligent hiring court actions. These cases have been increasing of
late, and are due to employers hiring employees that then go on to cause injury
to other employees, or the company corporate, when reasonable care and
attention in checking out employee's past records could have prevented the
injury occurring.
For example, if an employee with a record of violence is taken on, and then
assaults another employee in the workplace, the employer can be guilty of
negligent hiring if the criminal record could have been uncovered with a proper
background check.
There are several federal regulations, such as the Fair Credit Reporting
Act, that restrict what records an employer is allowed to access about a
prospective employee. For example you cannot find out information about civil
lawsuits or convictions after seven years, credit accounts placed for
collection after seven years or bankruptcies after ten years. Additionally, if
you employ a third party to carry out your background checks, you need the
permission of the applicant to carry out a applicant screening report, and are
obliged to inform them of the results of the investigation.
Of course, potential violence is not the only reason for background checks,
and others are terrorism, where employees in certain industries need to make
sure that the information and skills acquired in the course of the employment
will not be used for the purposes of terrorism, and also people applying for
work involving children, the disabled or the elderly have to be properly
screened under Californian state law.
It is an unfortunate fact that over 30% of all CVs and resumes are
falsified, and employers are rapidly becoming compelled to carry out effective
screening before offering employment. The penalties for employing unsuitable
qualified people without carrying out full employee background checks are too
high for employers to make assumptions. Candidates for all high profile jobs
within a company are now as fully screened as possible, within the constraints
applied by federal and individual state law.
In California, these laws provide more protection for the applicant than
federal law. Even in the initial application form, where employers may not even
request details of age, sex or race, it is not allowed to ask questions about
arrests, and questions on convictions are permissible only if they are job
related.
If you are a federal or state employee, your employment record is protected,
and your employer is not obliged to provide information to prospective
employees, except under specific circumstances. The same applies to your
medical records. You should be very careful, however, about refusing permission
to your prospective employer. Tthey will think the worst and will be unlikely
to employ you.
The Fair Credit Reporting Act, that requires an employer to inform the
employee of a consumer report, request written permission for it and inform
them if the check was the result of their application being refused, does not
apply if the employer carries out the checks themselves rather than employ a
third party.
In California, however, this loophole is closed, and employees have the
right to notice, consent and to receive a copy of the credit report.
Additionally, in California, a copy of the investigating agency report must be
available in both Spanish and English.
All of this simply indicates that employers have to be aware of state law as
well as federal law when carrying out a California background check and that it
is probably best to use the services of an investigating agency that is
familiar with California law with respect to employee screening.
|